10 mile run. Better than last week, still not spectacular. But...I'm not unhappy...
1:49:54 which is 10:99/mile. Last week I ran in MUCH less wind and 8 miles, and my pace was 11:00/mile and that didn't include all my stopping. So...woot. =)
High-hang Power Snatch + OHS x 3 - 45# H.H. Snatch x 3 - 45# H.H. Snatch x 3 - 65# Mid-hang Snatch x 3 - 65# Below-knee Snatch x 4 - 65# Snatch x 4 - 65#
This was good.
10! for time (CTB pull-ups, box jumps, GHD sit-ups) 11:42
The pull-ups were continuous, but I could have transitioned faster from the GHDs to the pull-ups and not spent so much time sucking wind. The box jumps were kind of slow.
3 RFT (DL, double-unders) 4:01
I was very excited when the main site posted this one - it has two movements that I like and feel pretty solid about. As a result, I decided I might try it as the second WOD in a 2-a-day type of deal.
I wanted to hit sub-4:00. Everything was unbroken, but I spent too much time re-gathering myself between movements. This is one situation where looking at my watch might have been a good thing.
4 comments:
10 mile run. Better than last week, still not spectacular. But...I'm not unhappy...
1:49:54 which is 10:99/mile. Last week I ran in MUCH less wind and 8 miles, and my pace was 11:00/mile and that didn't include all my stopping. So...woot. =)
Snatch Work
High-hang Power Snatch + OHS x 3 - 45#
H.H. Snatch x 3 - 45#
H.H. Snatch x 3 - 65#
Mid-hang Snatch x 3 - 65#
Below-knee Snatch x 4 - 65#
Snatch x 4 - 65#
This was good.
10! for time (CTB pull-ups, box jumps, GHD sit-ups)
11:42
The pull-ups were continuous, but I could have transitioned faster from the GHDs to the pull-ups and not spent so much time sucking wind. The box jumps were kind of slow.
3 RFT (DL, double-unders)
4:01
I was very excited when the main site posted this one - it has two movements that I like and feel pretty solid about. As a result, I decided I might try it as the second WOD in a 2-a-day type of deal.
I wanted to hit sub-4:00. Everything was unbroken, but I spent too much time re-gathering myself between movements. This is one situation where looking at my watch might have been a good thing.
It would be fun to try this one fresh sometime.
I hate to tell you this Kiley, but 10:99/mile is actually slower than 11:00/mile . . . like 39 seconds per mile slower.
Fortunately, I think you meant 10.99 min/mile, which works out to 10:59/mile (couldn't resist).
Nice work yo.
Meggers, I will punch you right in the ovary. Because you are right.
Post a Comment